Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Riverbank cultivation is a valuable agricultural practice that performs essential functions including socio-economic along the Upper Kafue River Basin in Kitwe, Zambia. Even though river banks are considered the most endangered ecosystems globally, they continue to face degradation through cultivation putting pressures on land use. This study assessed socio-economic determinants of participating in riverbank cultivation at household level. Open ended questionnaire was administered as the main data collection tool. Questionnaire survey data were collected from 244 households living in thirteen unplanned compounds. This was complimented with transect walks. Data was then analyzed using the logistic regression model to establish socio-economic drivers that significantly drove river and stream bank cultivation. The findings from the study show that riverbank cultivation promoted livelihoods of the poor, household head's age positively influenced riverbank cultivation, unprecedented levels of poverty, unemployment and education level strongly contributed to household's decision to cultivate on riverbanks in order for them to be food secure and generate income. Larger family households had higher demand for food consumption putting more pressure on riverbank cultivation for food provisions. Unclear land titles stood out as a major challenge households faced whilst male household heads had entitlement to agricultural land. Declining soil fertility led to low agriculture productivity driving households to cultivate riverbanks where soils were more productive through-out the year. The current land-use and agricultural policies are indifferent towards river bank cultivation in Zambia, with the effect of encouraging the practice. The study recommends the need to strengthen the enforcement of laws governing riverbank cultivation in order to reduce encroachment of agriculture expansions whilst encouraging sustainable agriculture development into these natural resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denga et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: