Key result
Self-administered substance use screening proves preferable, highlighting the TAPS tool for ease and brevity.
Why the study?
Barriers to addictive disorder screening exist and the feasibility of using available screening tests in primary care is unclear.
Which substance use disorder screening tests are feasible for use in primary care?
Systematic Review
Which substance use disorder screening tests are feasible for use in primary care?
Self-administered electronic screening tests, particularly the TAPS tool, offer a feasible and balanced approach for detecting substance use disorders in primary care settings.
Self-administered TAPS supports feasible primary care SUD screening; extends evidence favoring brief electronic formats.
Substance use disorders substantially contribute to the global burden of disease. Early detection in primary care is recommended, and numerous screening tests are available. However, barriers to addictive disorder screening exist and the feasibility of using these tests in primary care is unclear. This study aims to identify available addictive disorder screening tests whose feasibility has been evaluated in primary care. This systematic literature review was performed using Pubmed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library databases. The search strategy included four research topics: addictive disorders, screening, primary care, and feasibility. Selection criteria included published studies evaluating the feasibility of an addictive disorder screening test in primary care. Data were extracted for each included article, and each analyzed screening test. Of the 4911 articles selected, 20 were included and 16 screening tests were studied. Physician feasibility was evaluated with satisfaction questionnaires or qualitative studies, mainly measuring test administration time. Patient feasibility was measured using criteria including "ease of use", comprehension, or format preference. Self-administered formats were preferred, especially electronic versions. Overall, the TAPS (Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use) tool provides a good balance between ease of use, brevity of administration and more extensive screening for substance use disorders. Feasibility appears to be a set of heterogeneous criteria relating to users, including comprehension or satisfaction, and practical aspects, including administration time or format preference. The criteria synthesized in this review could serve as a basis for screening test feasibility studies in primary care given the absence of feasibility study guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pautrat et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Substance use disorders. Substance use disorder screening tests was evaluated on Feasibility (physician and patient criteria). A systematic review of 20 articles evaluating 16 substance use screening tests found self-administered formats are preferred, with the TAPS tool balancing ease of use and brevity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: