Cross-sectional analysis finds higher nonmelanoma skin cancer prevalence among sexual minorities, highlighting significant health disparities.
Background: Sexual minority individuals seem to be at higher risk for skin cancer than heterosexual individuals. This repeated cross-sectional study of US adults examined lifetime self-reported nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) prevalence by sexual orientation and across race/ethnicity and gender. Methods: Using 2022 and 2023 waves of the Behavioral Risk Factor Survey System, we calculated self-reported lifetime NMSC by sexual orientation among US adults, using unadjusted and age-adjusted modified Poisson models employing complex sampling design weights. Results: Compared with heterosexual individuals, age-adjusted NMSC was higher among gay/lesbian individuals (age-adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–1.74). Prevalence did not differ among bisexual individuals and was lower among individuals who reported “something else/don’t know” (0.52, 0.44–0.60) or refused to answer (0.78, 0.68–0.88). Results varied across race/ethnicity and gender. Racial/ethnic minority (REM) gay/lesbian individuals (3.59, 1.30–9.87) had a higher prevalence compared with REM heterosexual individuals. Non-Latine White gay/lesbian individuals (1.12, 0.96–1.32) had a higher prevalence than non-Latine White heterosexual individuals, though not significant. Gay men (1.12, 0.92–1.37) reported elevated, though not significant, prevalence compared with heterosexual men, whereas lesbian women (1.52, 1.04–2.23) had a higher prevalence compared with heterosexual women. Conclusions: We found heterogeneity in NMSC prevalence by sexual orientation across racial/ethnic and gender groups. Gay/lesbian individuals reported higher prevalence than their heterosexual counterparts across strata, but disparities were most pronounced among REM gay/lesbian individuals. Impact: There is a critical need to understand the factors driving differential burden and address modifiable NMSC risk factors to reduce disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schroeder et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: