PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2002ANZ Journal of Surgery43 citations

Elective resection and anastomosis for colorectal cancer: A prospective audit of mortality and morbidity 1976−1998

View Full Paper
MKMark KillingbackPBPrudence BarronODOwen F. Dent

Key Result

Extra-peritoneal anastomoses for colorectal cancer resulted in a significantly higher rate of clinical anastomotic leaks compared to intraperitoneal anastomoses (4.7% vs 0.2%; P < 0.0001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=1,392)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does extra-peritoneal anastomosis compared to intraperitoneal anastomosis affect postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective resection for colorectal cancer?

P
Population
1392 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer undergoing open elective resection and anastomosis
I
Intervention
Extra-peritoneal anastomoses (EPA)
C
Comparator
Intraperitoneal anastomoses (IPA)
O
Outcome
Postoperative morbidity and mortalityhard clinical

Extra-peritoneal anastomoses are associated with a significantly higher rate of clinical anastomotic leaks compared to intraperitoneal anastomoses in elective colorectal cancer resection.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 4.7% vs 0.2%

p-value: p=< 0.0001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to audit the morbidity and mortality for colorectal cancer after open elective resection and anastomosis by a single colorectal surgeon (MK), with reference to any differences between intraperitoneal (IPA) and extra-peritoneal anastomoses (EPA). METHODS: The prospective documentation of postoperative complications was compiled by the surgeon, charge nurses and a research assistant (PB). The operations were performed in three hospitals between 1976 and 1998. RESULTS: Some 1392 consecutive patients were treated electively by 1418 resections with anastomosis. There were 23 postoperative deaths (1.6%). Significant adverse events, which were potentially avoidable, occurred in 10 (43.5%) of the patients who died. The morbidity rate was 41.6%. Clinical anastomotic leaks occurred more frequently in EPA (27/581, 4.7%) than in IPA (2/827, 0.2%; P < 0.0001). Anastomotic leak caused the death of two patients (0.14%).Routine prophylactic anticoagulation did not decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism. Significant thrombophlebitis at the intravenous cannula site occurred in 54 patients (3.8%), wound infection in 29 (2.1%), and postural peripheral nerve injury in the upper limbs occurred in 11 patients (0.8%). Thirty-eight patients (2.7%) were returned to the operating theatre for 42 unscheduled operations. CONCLUSION: Mortality associated with elective resection of colorectal cancer with anastomosis is principally related to age, cardio-vascular disease and avoidable adverse events. A wide range of complications may follow this type of surgery, especially after extra peritoneal operations. A classification of anastomotic leaks is suggested to assist in comparisons of this complication which remains a significant concern following extra peritoneal anastomoses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Killingback et al. (2002) conducted an observational in colorectal cancer (n=1,392). Extra-peritoneal anastomosis vs. Intraperitoneal anastomosis was evaluated on Clinical anastomotic leaks (p=< 0.0001). Extra-peritoneal anastomoses for colorectal cancer resulted in a significantly higher rate of clinical anastomotic leaks compared to intraperitoneal anastomoses (4.7% vs 0.2%; P < 0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cbca42f38aa728df260c6https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02524.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper