Key result
Ranolazine fails to improve global peak early diastolic strain rate in asymptomatic moderate-to-severe AS.
Why the study?
Does ranolazine improve peak early diastolic strain rate in patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis and diastolic dysfunction?
Does ranolazine improve peak early diastolic strain rate in patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis and diastolic dysfunction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ranolazine did not significantly improve diastolic function measured by CMR in asymptomatic patients with moderate-severe aortic stenosis.
BACKGROUND: Ranolazine is a new anti-anginal drug that acts via late sodium current inhibition, and has been shown to improve diastolic dysfunction in isolated myocytes. Diastolic dysfuntion is common in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), and precedes symptom development and systolic dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of ranolazine on peak early diastolic strain rate (PEDSR) and exercise capacity in patients with AS. METHODS: Patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe AS and diastolic dysfunction underwent trans-thoracic echocardiography, exercise testing and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at baseline, 6 weeks after commencing ranolazine and at 10 weeks (4 weeks after discontinuation). Diastolic function was assessed using PEDSR measured on tagged CMR images. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (peak pressure gradient 48.8 ± 12.4 mmHg, mean pressure gradient 27.1 ± 7.5 mmHg, aortic valve area 1.26 ± 0.31 cm(2)) completed the week-6 visit and 13 completed the final visit. Global PEDSR did not significantly increase from baseline (0.79 ± 0.15) to week-6 (0.86 ± 0.18, p = 0.198). There was a borderline significant increase in total exercise duration from 10.47 ± 3.68 min to 11.60 ± 3.25 min (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This small pilot study did not show a significant improvement in diastolic function with the use of ranolazine in asymptomatic patients with moderate-severe AS. Further studies with a larger population may be indicated. EduraCT number 2011-000111-26.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2016) studied Aortic stenosis with diastolic dysfunction (n=20). Ranolazine vs. Baseline was evaluated on Global peak early diastolic strain rate (PEDSR) (p=0.198). Ranolazine did not significantly improve global peak early diastolic strain rate compared to baseline (0.86 vs 0.79, p=0.198) in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: