Prospective cohort study reveals three molecular subtypes predicting immunotherapy response in microsatellite-instable colorectal cancer, highlighting opportunities for tailored treatment.
Microsatellite-instable (MSI) tumours constitute one-fifth of colorectal cancers (CRCs).However, the MSI CRCs display substantial tumour microenvironment (TME) heterogeneity and variable responses to immunotherapy, necessitating a refined classification to guide personalized therapy.In this study, we analysed whole-genome and transcriptome sequences from 223 MSI CRC patients from a large prospective longitudinal cancer study in Sweden (Nunes L, Li F, Wu M, et al.Prognostic genome and transcriptome signatures in colorectal cancers.Nature.2024;633(8028):137-146) and identified three molecular subclasses with distinct TME and genetic features: class 1a (immune-excluded), characterized by prominent stromal activation, transforming growth factor- signalling, and low tumour neoantigen burdens (TNB); class 1b (immune-infiltrated), marked by intact neoantigen presentation and strong antitumour immunity; and class 2 (immune-cold), exhibiting epithelial features, high tumour mutation burden (TMB) and TNB, chromosomal instability, active metabolism, and a lack of immune activation.We further uncovered a correlation between mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) hypermethylation and the immune-cold phenotype in class 2, where anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) combination immunotherapy demonstrated significantly improved efficacy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.Finally, the molecular features of these subclasses were validated in external MSI CRC cohorts and in MSI tumours from other cancers.Our findings offer a comprehensive understanding of the molecular landscape of MSI CRC, unveiling potential molecular mechanisms underlying different tumour-immune phenotypes and laying the foundation for future development of tailored treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: