PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1983British Journal of Haematology21 citations

The production of colony stimulating activity by monocyte enriched fractions from murine continuous bone marrow culture adherent layers

View Full Paper
DODavid J. OblonRoger Williams Medical CenterHCHugo Castro‐MalaspinaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterHBHal E. BroxmeyerRutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The production of colony stimulating activity (GM-CSA) within murine continuous bone marrow cultures was investigated by subjecting either the nonadherent or the adherent layer cells to separation by velocity sedimentation. The presence of GM-CSA in conditioned medium was defined by the support of granulocyte/macrophage colony formation in soft agar culture. Cell free conditioned medium from weekly feedings of intact continuous marrow cultures and medium conditioned by each fraction of velocity sedimentation separated, nonadherent cells did not contain assayable GM-CSA. However, medium conditioned by fractions of adherent layer cells with a modal sedimentation velocity of 8.8 mm/h (range 6.2-10.6 mm/h) contained GM-CSA. Cytochemical studies with Wright's-Giemsa and non-specific esterase stains in addition to immunofluorescent studies with anti-collagen III, anti-collagen IV and monoclonal anti-Mac I antibodies to define fibroblasts, endothelial cells and monocytes, respectively, demonstrated that the cells within the GM-CSA producing fractions were enriched with monocytes/macrophages. Fibroblasts and a small proportion of endothelial cells were also present. GM-CSA is produced within the microenvironment (adherent layer) of murine continuous marrow cultures. Either adherent layer monocytes and/or a monocyte-endothelial cell interaction account for the GM-CSA production.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oblon et al. (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ccc823239dcc1e4625c7chttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1983.tb02098.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Simultaneous synthesis of types I and III collagen by fibroblasts in culture.1976 · 216 citations
  2. 2Physical separation of colony stimulating cells from in vitro colony forming cells in hemopoietic tissue1972 · 115 citations
  3. 3Production of Colony-Stimulating Factor in Mitogen-Stimulated Lymphocyte Cultures1974 · 207 citations
  4. 4Heterogeneity among resident murine peritoneal macrophages: separation and functional characterization of monocytoid cells producing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and responding to regulation by lactoferrin.1981 · 31 citations
  5. 5Immunohistochemical Demonstration of Basement Membrane Collagen in Normal Human Skin and in Psoriasis1979 · 32 citations