A new class of thiocyanate‐free Ru(II) sensitizers with 4,4′‐dicarboxyvinyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine anchor and two trans ‐oriented pyrid‐2‐yl pyrazolate (or triazolate) functional chromophores is synthesized, characterized, and evaluated in dye‐sensitized solar cells (DSCs). Despite their enhanced red response and absorptivity when compared to the parent sensitizer TFRS‐2 that possesses standard 4,4′‐dicarboxyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine anchor and shows the best conversion efficiency of η = 9.82%, the newly synthesized carboxyvinyl‐pyrazolate sensitizers, TFRS‐11 – TFRS‐13 , exhibit inferior performance characteristics in terms of short‐circuit current density ( J SC ), open‐circuit voltage ( V OC ), and power conversion efficiency ( η ), the latter being recorded to be in the range 5.60–7.62%. The reduction in device efficiencies is attributed to a combination of poor packing of these sensitizers on the TiO 2 surface and less positive ground‐state oxidation potentials, which, respectively, increase charge recombination with I 3 − in electrolytes and impede the regeneration of sensitizers by I − anions. The latter obstacle can be circumvented in part by the replacement of the pyrazolates with triazolates, forming the TFRS‐14 sensitizer, which exhibits an improved J SC , V OC , and η of 16.4 mAcm −2 , 0.77 V, and 9.02%, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: