The structure of bilinear cyclic convolution algorithms is explored over finite fields. The algorithms derived are valid for any length not divisible by the field characteristic and are based upon the small length polynomial multiplication algorithms. The multiplicative complexity of these algorithms is small and depends on the field of constants. The linear transformation matrices <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">A, B</tex> (premultiplication), and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">C</tex> (postmultiplication) defining the algorithm have block structures which are related to one another. The rows of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">A</tex> and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">B</tex> and the columns of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">C</tex> are maximal length recurrent sequences. Because of the highly regular structure of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">A, B</tex> , and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">C</tex> , the algorithms can be very easily designed even for large lengths. The application of these algorithms to the decoding of Reed-Solomon codes is also examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagh et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: