Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Purpose: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been suggested as a major prognostic factor in resected stage-III colon cancer. We analyzed ctDNA of patients randomized in the phase III IDEA-France trial. Experimental Design: ctDNA was tested for WIF1 and NPY by droplet digital PCR with method developed and validated for colorectal cancer. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via multivariable analysis in patients with ctDNA samples and in sub-groups according to treatment duration (3/6 months) and disease stage (high/low-risk stage III). Results: Of 2,010 randomized patients, 1,345 had available ctDNA samples (1,017 collected both post-surgery and pre-chemotherapy). More Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 (78% versus 69%) and T4 and/or N2 (40% versus 36%) were observed in patients studied (n = 1017) versus not analyzed (n = 993). There were 877 ctDNA-negative (86.2%) and 140 ctDNA-positive (13.8%) patients; their baseline characteristics were similar. With a median follow-up of 6.6 years, the 3-year DFS rate was 66.39% for ctDNA-positive patients and 76.71% for ctDNA-negative patients (P = 0.015). ctDNA was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker for DFS (adjusted HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.13–2.12, P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.12–2.43, P = 0.011). ctDNA was prognostic in patients treated for 3 months and with T4 and/or N2 tumors, but not in those treated for 6 months and with T1–3/N1 tumors. Conclusions: In this first ctDNA assessment of a large series of patients with stage III colon cancer enrolled in phase III trial, post-surgery ctDNA was found in 13.8% of them and was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker. See related commentary by Bent and Kopetz, p. 5449
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Julien Taı̈eb
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Valérie Taly
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Julie Henriques
Inserm
Clinical Cancer Research
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Inserm
Sorbonne Université
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Taı̈eb et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cd5cd63ecdfd686625a7d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0271
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: