// Xinqun Li 1 , Yang Lu 1 , Haiquan Lu 1 , Jingtao Luo 1, 2 , Yun Hong 1, 3 , Zhen Fan 1 1 Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 2 Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China 3 Department of Oral Medicine, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Correspondence to: Zhen Fan, e-mail: zfan@mdanderson.org Keywords: EGFR, cetuximab, HIF-1, AMPK, cancer metabolism Received: January 21, 2015 Accepted: February 23, 2015 Published: March 20, 2015 ABSTRACT We previously reported that cetuximab, an EGFR-blocking antibody, inhibits cancer metabolism via downregulation of HIF-1α and reverses the Warburg effect in cancer cells. Here, we report that inhibition of HIF-1 transcriptional activity by cetuximab does not necessarily lead to successful inhibition of cell proliferation. In several head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines, we observed a pattern of oscillating decrease and increase of intracellular ATP level after cetuximab treatment, and the magnitude and kinetics of which varied by cell line and appeared to be linked to the extent of cellular response to cetuximab. In HNSCC cells with low basal level of AMPK activity and that responded to cetuximab-induced growth inhibition, there was a transient, LKB1-dependent activation of AMPK. In contrast, HNSCC cells that had a high basal level of AMPK activity were less sensitive to cetuximab-induced growth inhibition despite effective inhibition of EGFR downstream signaling by cetuximab. Knockdown or inhibition of AMPK markedly enhanced response to cetuximab via induction of apoptosis. These findings indicate that a transient activation of AMPK is an early metabolic marker of cellular response to cetuximab and that high and sustained AMPK activity is an important mechanism by which cancer cells survive cetuximab treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: