Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• BW sequencing can be used to diagnose nodules suspected of early-stage lung cancer. • BW sequencing shows high diagnostic accuracy in patients with necrotic lesions. • BW sequencing could provide guidance in determining next diagnostic steps. • BW sequencing can provide information about the molecular profile of tumors. • BW sequencing could reduce invasive diagnostic tests and subsequent complications. Early-stage lung cancers detected by low-dose computed tomography (CT) often require confirmation through invasive procedures due to the absence of endobronchial lesions. This study assesses the diagnostic utility of bronchial washing fluid (BW) sequencing, a less invasive alternative, aiming to identify patient characteristics most suited for this approach. From June 2017 to March 2018, we conducted a prospective cohort study by enrolling patients with incidental lung lesions suspected of early-stage lung cancer at two independent hospitals, and 114 were diagnosed with lung cancer while 50 were diagnosed with benign lesions. BW sequencing was performed using a targeted gene panel, and the clinical characteristics of patients detected with cancer through sequencing were identified. Malignant cells were detected in 33 patients (28.9 %) through BW cytology. By applying specificity-focused mutation criteria, BW sequencing classified 42 patients (36.8 %) as having cancer. Among the cancer patients who were BW sequencing positive and BW cytology negative, 15 patients (75.0 %) showed necrosis on CT. The sensitivity of BW sequencing was particularly enhanced in patients with necrotic tumors, reaching 75 %. BW sequencing presents a viable, non-invasive diagnostic option for early-stage lung cancer, especially valuable in patients with necrotic lesions. By potentially reducing the reliance on more invasive diagnostic procedures, this method could streamline clinical workflows, decrease patient burden, and improve overall diagnostic efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: