PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2012Journal of Applied Psychology458 citations

Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries.

View Full Paper
TRThomas RockstuhlJDJames H. DulebohnSASoon Ang

Key Points

  • This research investigates how national culture moderates the relationships between leader-member exchange (LMX) and its various correlates.
  • Meta-analysis of 282 independent samples totaling N = 68,587 from 23 countries.
  • Controlled for extreme response style differences to ensure accurate findings.
  • Examined correlations between LMX and outcomes like job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior.
  • LMX is more strongly related to organizational citizenship behavior and job satisfaction in horizontal-individualistic cultures (e.g., Western) than in vertical-collectivistic cultures (e.g., Asian).
  • No significant cultural influence on the relationships between LMX and task performance or organizational commitment.
  • Members' responses may be shaped by collective interests and role-based obligations in Asian contexts.

Abstract

This study extends leader-member exchange (LMX) research by meta-analyzing the role of national culture in moderating relationships between LMX and its correlates. Results based on 282 independent samples (N = 68,587) from 23 countries and controlling for extreme response style differences indicate that (a) relationships of LMX with organizational citizenship behavior, justice perceptions, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and leader trust are stronger in horizontal-individualistic (e.g., Western) contexts than in vertical-collectivistic (e.g., Asian) contexts; and (b) national culture does not affect relationships of LMX with task performance, organizational commitment, and transformational leadership. These findings highlight that although members are universally sensitive to how their leaders treat them, members' responses in Asian contexts may also be influenced by collective interests and role-based obligations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rockstuhl et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cf0b73736e3f7aa7c76dfhttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0029978
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing Culture and Retention through an Expanded Leader-Member Exchange Theory: A Focus on Commitment and Fairness2025
  2. 2How leader-member exchange affects work outcomes in small-and-medium enterprises?2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Can participative leadership and LMX congruence promote collective organizational engagement?2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Leader-Member Exchange Theory in Healthcare: Examining Its Role in Enhancing Team Collaboration and Productivity2025
  5. 5Leaders' mental health and leader‐member exchange: Exploring relations on different levels of analysis2024 · 1 citations