PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2015Journal of Clinical Oncology356 citations

Personalizing Colon Cancer Adjuvant Therapy: Selecting Optimal Treatments for Individual Patients

View Full Paper
RDRodrigo DienstmannRSRamón SalazarJTJosep Tabernero

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

For more than three decades, postoperative chemotherapy-initially fluoropyrimidines and more recently combinations with oxaliplatin-has reduced the risk of tumor recurrence and improved survival for patients with resected colon cancer. Although universally recommended for patients with stage III disease, there is no consensus about the survival benefit of postoperative chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer. The most recent adjuvant clinical trials have not shown any value for adding targeted agents, namely bevacizumab and cetuximab, to standard chemotherapies in stage III disease, despite improved outcomes in the metastatic setting. However, biomarker analyses of multiple studies strongly support the feasibility of refining risk stratification in colon cancer by factoring in molecular characteristics with pathologic tumor staging. In stage II disease, for example, microsatellite instability supports observation after surgery. Furthermore, the value of BRAF or KRAS mutations as additional risk factors in stage III disease is greater when microsatellite status and tumor location are taken into account. Validated predictive markers of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit for stage II or III colon cancer are lacking, but intensive research is ongoing. Recent advances in understanding the biologic hallmarks and drivers of early-stage disease as well as the micrometastatic environment are expected to translate into therapeutic strategies tailored to select patients. This review focuses on the pathologic, molecular, and gene expression characterizations of early-stage colon cancer; new insights into prognostication; and emerging predictive biomarkers that could ultimately help define the optimal adjuvant treatments for patients in routine clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dienstmann et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cf728a064aa35e1cc8d43https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.60.0213
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Prognosis of T3N0 Colon Cancer Is Dependent on the Number of Lymph Nodes Examined2003 · 628 citations
  2. 2Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium (CRCSC) identification of a consensus of molecular subtypes.2014 · 53 citations
  3. 3Clinical Impact of Different Classes of Infiltrating T Cytotoxic and Helper Cells (Th1, Th2, Treg, Th17) in Patients with Colorectal Cancer2011 · 1,128 citations
  4. 4Colon Cancer Survival Is Associated With Increasing Number of Lymph Nodes Analyzed: A Secondary Survey of Intergroup Trial INT-00892003 · 1,162 citations
  5. 5Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 20142014 · 2,811 citations