Key result
LAAC offers an alternative to OAC for stroke prevention in high-bleeding-risk AF patients.
Why the study?
Is left atrial appendage closure a safe and effective alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of bleeding?
Is left atrial appendage closure a safe and effective alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of bleeding?
Left atrial appendage closure provides a device-based alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in high-bleeding-risk atrial fibrillation patients, emphasizing the importance of operator training and individualized post-procedure drug selection.
May support LAA closure consideration in high-bleeding-risk AF; leaves open optimal post-procedural regimens and operator training needs.
Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), a device-based therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, is considered an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy, particularly for patients at high risk of bleeding. Proof of concept has been demonstrated by the PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trials which evaluated the WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) versus warfarin, showing favourable outcome for the device group. The most commonly used devices for LAAC are the WATCHMAN and its successor, the WATCHMAN FLX (Boston Scientific) and the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug and more recently the AMPLATZER Amulet device (both St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). The procedure is typically performed via a transseptal puncture under fluoroscopic and echocardiographic guidance. Technically, it is considered quite demanding due to the anatomic variability and fragility of the appendage. Careful material manipulation, adequate operator training, and good cardiac imaging and device sizing allow a safe, uneventful procedure. Post-procedure antithrombotic drug selection is based on the patient's history, indication and quality of LAAC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzikas et al. (2016) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) vs. Oral anticoagulation therapy was evaluated. Left atrial appendage closure is considered an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly those at high risk of bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: