Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The experimental investigation was conducted on a CI version Ricardo variable compression single cylinder naturally aspirated engine to examine the effects of ceramic coating on performance and exhaust emissions. Tests were carried out at 1500rpm over a wide range of part loads, varying injection timings and compression ratios (CR). The top of the piston was insulated by using Yttria-partially stabilized zirconia with a bond coat alumino boro silicate. The technology by which the piston head was insulated is much more economical and simpler than the plasma-spray process usually used for coating with ceramics. Results show that at 30% of the rated load, BSFC decreases upto 9.99% at 40° injection bTDC (before top dead centre) for CR-19 resulting higher thermal efficiency than base line engine. Ignition delay is longer in ceramic coated engine than its counter part. For CR-18 and 19 these ranges are 1.3% to 7.94% at different injection timings. Volumetric efficiency drops over the ranges 3.1% to 6.04% at different compression ratios from base line engine. NOx level is lower in ceramic coated piston engine. At 30% of the rated load, NOx level decreases 32.14% to 45.77% with injection angles 30° bTDC and 40° bTDC respectively for CR-19 in ceramic coated piston engine than the metal piston engine. CO level is higher in ceramic coated engine than base line level. But this increase is comparatively lower at CR-19 and even lower with higher injection angle 40° bTDC. At higher compression ratios CR-19 and 20 smoke density decreases upto 37.93% and 37.5% at 40° bTDC from base line engine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beg et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: