Key result
Low clopidogrel response linked to ~840% higher 30-day ST risk versus normal responders.
Why the study?
Light transmission aggregometry links poor clopidogrel response to adverse cardiovascular events after PCI but is labor-intensive and inconvenient for routine use, making a point-of-care assay desirable.
Does high platelet reactivity (low response) to clopidogrel assessed with point-of-care multiple electrode aggregometry predict early drug-eluting stent thrombosis in patients undergoing PCI?
Population
1,608 consecutive CAD patients with planned drug-eluting stent implantation
Comparison
Clopidogrel low responders vs normal responders by MEA
Design
Prospective trial
Follow-up
30 days
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“We're still not measuring [platelet reactivity] in patients as a standard of care. We're not moving the needle.”
Low clopidogrel reactivity identifies higher early stent thrombosis risk after DES; leaves open whether monitoring or adjustment improves outcomes.
Cohort (n=1,608)
Does high platelet reactivity (low response) to clopidogrel assessed with point-of-care multiple electrode aggregometry predict early drug-eluting stent thrombosis in patients undergoing PCI?
Odds Ratio: 9.4 (95% CI 3.1–28.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.2% vs 0.2%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Point-of-care assessment of clopidogrel response using multiple electrode aggregometry can effectively identify patients at high risk for early drug-eluting stent thrombosis.
Sibbing et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in coronary artery disease (n=1,608). Low response to clopidogrel vs. Normal response to clopidogrel was evaluated on definite ST at 30 days (OR 9.4, 95% CI 3.1 to 28.4, p=< 0.0001). Low response to clopidogrel assessed with MEA was associated with a higher risk of definite stent thrombosis at 30 days compared with normal response (2.2% vs 0.2%; OR 9.4; 95% CI 3.1-28.4; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: