Key result
A 5% reduction in left atrial strain is linked to ~92% higher ESUS odds versus LAA.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate left atrial function in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source compared with other subtypes of acute ischemic stroke related to large-vessel occlusion.
Is left atrial strain associated with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) in patients with large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke?
Observational (n=126)
Is left atrial strain associated with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) in patients with large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke?
Reduced left atrial strain is associated with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) in patients with large-vessel occlusion, suggesting a potential role for LA myopathy in ESUS etiology.
Reduced LA strain was associated with ESUS in large-vessel occlusion; hypothesis-generating for LA myopathy and requires prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate left atrial (LA) function in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) and other subtypes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) related to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). METHODS: Consecutive patients with LVO-related AIS were prospectively enrolled from July 2019 to August 2022. To compare LA function with ESUS patients, a control group without prior stroke was sex- and age-matched with ESUS patients in a 1:1 ratio. LA strain was measured within 3 days after stroke. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess associations between LA function and stroke subtypes. RESULTS: This study included 126 patients (mean age 67.7 ± 12.3 year, 39.7% women). Of these, 28 patients met the diagnostic criteria for ESUS, while the remaining were classified as large artery atherosclerosis (n = 49) and non-valvular AF-related cardioembolic stroke (n = 49). Patients with ESUS had lower left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) and left atrial conduit strain (LAScd) compared to those with large artery atherosclerosis (27.8 ± 7.1% vs. 32.0 ± 5.3%, p = 0.004, and 14.3 ± 3.8% vs. 17.3 ± 4.6%, p = 0.005, respectively) and the control group (27.8 ± 7.1% vs. 37.6 ± 7.2%, p < 0.001 and 14.3 ± 3.8% vs. 21.5 ± 7.9%, p < 0.001, respectively). A 5% reduction in LASr and LAScd was associated with a 1.92- and 2.45-fold increase, respectively, in the likelihood of having ESUS compared to large artery atherosclerosis. Lower LASr and LAScd in ESUS patients were prone to be associated with a higher likelihood of cardiovascular events during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: LA strain is associated with ESUS in stroke patients with LVO. Further studies are needed to explore its utility in identifying specific stroke etiologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic stroke related to large-vessel occlusion (n=126). Left atrial strain measurement vs. Large artery atherosclerosis and non-stroke controls was evaluated on Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) in ESUS compared to large artery atherosclerosis (OR 1.92 per 5% reduction, p=0.004). A 5% reduction in left atrial reservoir and conduit strain increased the likelihood of embolic stroke of undetermined source by 1.92- and 2.45-fold compared to large artery atherosclerosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: