Key result
Higher post-cardioversion S3 intensity predicts a ~152% greater risk of AF relapse.
Why the study?
Does acoustic cardiography immediately post-electrical cardioversion predict atrial fibrillation relapse in patients who underwent successful cardioversion?
Cohort (n=140)
Does acoustic cardiography immediately post-electrical cardioversion predict atrial fibrillation relapse in patients who underwent successful cardioversion?
Acoustic cardiography, specifically S3 strength, measured immediately after electrical cardioversion may serve as a simple bedside method to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence.
May inform post-cardioversion monitoring; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after successful electrical cardioversion (ECV) is difficult. The main aim of this study was to investigate whether acoustic cardiography (AUDICOR® 200) immediately post-ECV might provide indices for AF relapse following cardioversion. Acoustic cardiography parameters included Electromechanical Activation Time (EMAT), Left Ventricular Systolic Time (LVST), QRS duration, heart rate and third heart sound intensity (S3 Strength). We analysed data from 140 patients who underwent successful cardioversion and in whom AUDICOR results and echocardiographic measurements immediately after (baseline) ECV were available. Patients were prospectively followed-up at 4-6 weeks, 3 and 12 months post-ECV, and sinus rhythm maintenance was evaluated using acoustic cardiography and Holter electrocardiography. The effect of each baseline AUDICOR parameter on the hazard of AF relapse was investigated using Cox proportional hazards (PH) models. Fifty patients (35.7%) had AF relapse. Of all the AUDICOR parameters, only S3 Strength exhibited consistent predictive value. Increasing S3 Strength increased the hazard of relapse in a univariable Cox PH model (HR=2.52, p=0.003), and in two multivariable Cox PH model constructions (Model 1 excluded heart rate and Model II excluded EMAT/RR, LVST and LVST/RR) both of which included the parameters as continuous variables (Model I: HR=1.15, p=0.042; Model II: HR=1.14, p=0.045) or the parameters dichotomized according to suggested cut-points (Model I: HR=2.5, p=0.007; Model II: HR=2.09, p=0.031). In conclusion, this study suggests that acoustic cardiography may be a simple inexpensive and quantitative bedside method to assist in prediction of AF recurrence after ECV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erné et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=140). Acoustic cardiography (AUDICOR 200) was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation relapse (HR 2.52, p=0.003). Higher third heart sound intensity (S3 Strength) measured by acoustic cardiography immediately after successful electrical cardioversion predicted an increased hazard of AF relapse (HR=2.52, p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: