Key result
Review of AF mechanisms across biological scales highlights potential to personalize pharmacotherapy and improve ablation.
Why the study?
Early maintenance of sinus rhythm in AF reduces major cardiovascular endpoints but is difficult to achieve, with unclear application of genetic and cellular discoveries to pharmacotherapy and suboptimal success with PVI.
This review emphasizes the transition towards personalized medicine in atrial fibrillation management by integrating multi-scale mechanistic data to optimize pharmacotherapy and ablation strategies.
Does not yet support personalized AF strategies in practice; leaves open prospective validation of multi-scale tailoring.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of heart failure and stroke. The early maintenance of sinus rhythm has been shown to reduce major cardiovascular endpoints, yet is difficult to achieve. For instance, it is unclear how discoveries at the genetic and cellular level can be used to tailor pharmacotherapy. For non-pharmacologic therapy, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone of rhythm control, yet has suboptimal success. Improving these therapies will likely require a multifaceted approach that personalizes therapy based on mechanisms measured in individuals across biological scales. We review AF mechanisms from cell-to-organ-to-patient from this perspective of personalized medicine, linking them to potential clinical indices and biomarkers, and discuss how these data could influence therapy. We conclude by describing approaches to improve ablation, including the emergence of several mapping systems that are in use today.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deb et al. (2021) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Personalized medicine and ablation strategies was evaluated. A review of atrial fibrillation mechanisms across biological scales highlights the potential for personalized medicine to tailor pharmacotherapy and improve ablation strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: