Key result
Systematic review identifies 198 heterogeneous noninvasive ECG devices for syncope, highlighting a need for further research.
Why the study?
The study aimed to identify research on noninvasive ECG monitoring devices, categorize current technologies, and define desirable recording features for personalized syncope evaluation.
Systematic Review (n=173)
There is a wide variety of noninvasive ECG monitoring devices available, but limited evidence specifically analyzing their usefulness in syncope patients.
Insufficient syncope-specific evidence warrants cautious device selection; leaves open need for targeted validation trials.
The aims of this study were (1) to identify research publications studying noninvasive electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring devices, (2) to define and categorize current technology in noninvasive ECG recording, and (3) to discuss desirable noninvasive recording features for personalized syncope evaluation to guide technological advancement and future studies. We performed a systematic review of the literature that assessed noninvasive ECG-monitoring devices, regardless of the reason for monitoring. We performed an Internet search and corresponded with syncope experts and companies to help identify further eligible products. We extracted information about included studies and device features. We found 173 relevant papers. The main reasons for ECG monitoring were atrial fibrillation (n = 45), coronary artery disease (n = 10), syncope (n = 8), palpitations (n = 8), other cardiac diseases (n = 67), and technological aspects of monitoring (n = 35). We identified 198 devices: 5 hospital telemetry devices, 12 patches, 46 event recorders, 70 Holter monitors, 23 external loop recorders, 20 mobile cardiac outpatient telemetries, and 22 multifunctional devices. The features of each device were very heterogeneous. There are a large number of ECG-monitoring devices with different features available in the market. Our findings may help clinicians select the appropriate device for their patients. Since there are only a few published articles analyzing their usefulness in syncope patients, further research might improve their use in this clinical setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solbiati et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in Suspected Cardiovascular Syncope (n=173). Noninvasive electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring devices was evaluated on Identification of research publications and devices for noninvasive ECG recording. A systematic review identified 173 relevant papers and 198 noninvasive ECG-monitoring devices with heterogeneous features, highlighting a need for further research on their usefulness in syncope.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: