Key result
Low right atrial reservoir strain at acute HF discharge links to ~80% greater mortality and rehospitalization.
Why the study?
Right atrial dysfunction may indicate advanced heart failure, but its prognostic role assessed by right atrial reservoir strain in hospitalized acute heart failure patients remains undetermined.
Does impaired right atrial reservoir strain predict all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=401)
Does impaired right atrial reservoir strain predict all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure?
Impaired right atrial reservoir strain (<11.4%) assessed at discharge provides incremental prognostic value for mortality and rehospitalization in patients with acute heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid discharge risk stratification in acute HF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Right atrial (RA) dysfunction might indicate an advanced stage of heart failure (HF). The prognostic role of RA dysfunction, assessed according to RA reservoir strain (RArS), in hospitalized acute HF patients remains undetermined. METHODS: All consecutive patients hospitalized for acute HF were prospectively enrolled and had speckle-tracking echocardiography at discharge. The primary end point was all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization. The patients were divided in 2 groups, on the basis of the RArS cutoff value derived from spline curve analysis. RESULTS: Of 401 patients (73.3 ± 12.1 years old; 60% male), 244 (55.1%) had RArS ≥ 11.4% and 177 (44.9%) had RArS < 11.4%. Worse left atrial and right ventricular (RV) function, larger RA size, and smaller left ventricular size were independently associated with RArS < 11.4%. During a median follow-up of 6 (interquartile range, 2.3-9.8) months, 141 (35.2%) patients reached the primary end point. Patients with RArS < 11.4% showed significantly higher percentage of cumulative events compared with patients with RArS ≥ 11.4% (49.2% vs 24.1%, respectively; log rank P < 0.001). Lower RArS was independently associated with the primary end point as a continuous (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95 [95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.99]; P =0.006) and as a categorical (RArS <11.4%: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.80 [95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.08]; P = 0.032) variable. RArS provided incremental prognostic value over relevant clinical and echocardiographic variables including RV size, RV function, and RA size. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired RArS was independently associated with worse outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute HF. Its assessment before discharge could potentially allow refined risk stratification. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05573997.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anastasiou et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute Heart Failure (n=401). Right atrial reservoir strain (RArS) < 11.4% vs. RArS ≥ 11.4% was evaluated on All-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.08, p=0.032). Right atrial reservoir strain <11.4% at discharge in acute heart failure patients was associated with increased all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization (HR 1.80; 95% CI 1.05-3.08; P=0.032).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: