PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1995Journal of Biological Chemistry396 citationsOpen Access

Arrestin Interactions with G Protein-coupled Receptors

VGVsevolod V. GurevichSDStéphane DionJOJames J. Onorato

Key Points

  • To identify the structural domains and molecular mechanisms that dictate how different arrestin proteins selectively bind to specific G protein-coupled receptors.
  • Characterized binding affinities of wild-type visual arrestin, beta-arrestin, and arrestin 3 across rhodopsin, beta 2-adrenergic receptors, and m2 muscarinic cholinergic receptors in various activation and phosphorylation states.
  • Engineered truncated and chimeric arrestin mutants to identify key structural regions involved in receptor recognition and selectivity.
  • Visual arrestin displayed the highest selectivity, exhibiting > 10-fold higher binding to the phosphorylated light-activated state of rhodopsin compared to any other receptor form.
  • Beta-arrestin and arrestin 3 preferentially bound phosphorylated activated receptors but only modestly discriminated among the three receptor types.
  • Mapping identified that binding selectivity is governed by an acidic C-terminal regulatory region, a basic N-terminal interaction domain, and two central receptor-specificity domains.

Abstract

Arrestins play an important role in quenching signal transduction initiated by G protein-coupled receptors. To explore the specificity of arrestin-receptor interaction, we have characterized the ability of various wild-type arrestins to bind to rhodopsin, the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2AR), and the m2 muscarinic cholinergic receptor (m2 mAChR). Visual arrestin was found to be the most selective arrestin since it discriminated best between the three different receptors tested (highest binding to rhodopsin) as well as between the phosphorylation and activation state of the receptor (> 10-fold higher binding to the phosphorylated light-activated form of rhodopsin compared to any other form of rhodopsin). While beta-arrestin and arrestin 3 were also found to preferentially bind to the phosphorylated activated form of a given receptor, they only modestly discriminated among the three receptors tested. To explore the structural characteristics important in arrestin function, we constructed a series of truncated and chimeric arrestins. Analysis of the binding characteristics of the various mutant arrestins suggests a common molecular mechanism involved in determining receptor binding selectivity. Structural elements that contribute to arrestin binding include: 1) a C-terminal acidic region that serves a regulatory role in controlling arrestin binding selectivity toward the phosphorylated and activated form of a receptor, without directly participating in receptor interaction; 2) a basic N-terminal domain that directly participates in receptor interaction and appears to serve a regulatory role via intramolecular interaction with the C-terminal acidic region; and 3) two centrally localized domains that are directly involved in determining receptor binding specificity and selectivity. A comparative structure-function model of all arrestins and a kinetic model of beta-arrestin and arrestin 3 interaction with receptors are proposed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gurevich et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d32b136162e2f4b09a787https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.2.720
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper