The Tiebout model of residential choice suggests that people freely shop among communities seeking a "market bundle" of local government services that best fits their preferences. Presumably, the different service/tax preferences of social groups help to explain their residential location. In this research on the suburban community growth of low-and high-income population, we find that differential service levels among communities have no relationship to income specific growth rates. However, we do find that, in contrast to low-income families, high-income families cluster in suburban communities with higher fiscal resources, giving them greater policy options in choosing service levels and tax rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: