Key result
Aerobic training reduces wasted pressure effort in Black adults and ventricular-vascular coupling in White adults.
Why the study?
Aerobic training preserves the ventricular-vascular coupling ratio and attenuates wasted pressure effort, but whether these benefits apply to Black adults was unknown.
Does aerobic training improve ventricular-vascular coupling and wasted pressure effort differently in Black compared to White young adults?
Does aerobic training improve ventricular-vascular coupling and wasted pressure effort differently in Black compared to White young adults?
Aerobic training produces differential cardiovascular adaptations in Black versus White young adults, specifically reducing wasted pressure effort in Black adults and improving ventricular-vascular coupling in White adults.
Differential effects of aerobic training by race may exist; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical consideration.
Background Black compared with White adults have a higher risk for left‐ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure possibly due to the early onset of alterations in ventricular–vascular coupling (ie, arterial [ E a ] to ventricular elastance [ E es ] ratio) and wasted pressure effort ( E w ). Aerobic training preserves the coupling ratio ( E a / E es ) and attenuates E w , but whether this applies to Black adults is unknown. We hypothesized that Black rather than White adults would have greater training‐induced improvements in the E a / E es and E w . Methods and Results Fifty‐four young adults with normal blood pressure (Black=24 [58% female]; White=30 [47% female], mean=24 years; SD=5 years) completed an 8‐week aerobic training (3 times/week, 65%–85% peak oxygen uptake). E a / E es was estimated via echocardiography and scaled to body surface area, and the E w was estimated from pulse contour analysis. Black adults had lower E a / E es (difference ( d )=0.49 [95% CI, 0.14–0.84 mm Hg/mL], P =0.007) and higher E w ( d =1127 [95% CI, 104–2007 dyne cm −2 s], P =0.005). Both groups exhibited similar (race‐by‐training interaction, P =0.986) training‐induced reductions in scaled E a ( d =−0.11 [95% CI, −0.18 to −0.04 mm Hg/mL], P <0.001). Only in White adults, scaled E es increased ( d white =0.39 [95% CI, 0.11–0.32 mm Hg/mL], P =0.003) and E a / E es was reduced ( d white =−0.16 [95% CI, −0.33 to −0.18 mm Hg/mL/m 2 ], P <0.001). Conversely, only Black adults exhibited reductions in E w after training ( d black =−699 [95% CI, −1209 to −189 dyne cm −2 s], P =0.008). Conclusions Aerobic training‐induced differential effects on E a / E es and E w of White and Black young adults hold the potential to reduce racial disparities. This warrants confirmation in a larger sample. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01024634.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marôco et al. (2024) studied normal blood pressure (n=54). Aerobic training vs. White adults vs Black adults was evaluated on ventricular-vascular coupling (Ea/Ees) and wasted pressure effort (Ew). Aerobic training reduced wasted pressure effort in Black adults (d=-699; P=0.008) and ventricular-vascular coupling in White adults (d=-0.16; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.18; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: