Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Choosing an appropriate mouse genetic background is a persistent challenge for successful translation of preclinical disease modeling. We present Strain Recommender, a genomic framework that prioritizes inbred mouse strains as relatively vulnerable or resilient to a disease state using disease-associated gene signatures and strain-specific transcriptome predictions. The method represents disease states as weighted gene scores, ranks 657 strains based on resemblance to the disease state, and estimates uncertainty via a permutation-derived false positive rate (FPR). In a prospective validation of connective tissue disorder predictions, vulnerable and resilient Collaborative Cross strains showed significantly different cardiovascular abnormalities. In a global retrospective validation predicting previously reported strain background effects, Strain Recommender achieved ≥ 90% sensitivity for 86.6% of diseases with 94.4% mean sensitivity (95% CI: 94.0-94.8%) across 5,890 diseases, including 92.3% (95% CI: 91.6-93.0%) for 2,598 rare diseases, demonstrating its potential to improve the validity of mouse models of human disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ball et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: