PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 7, 2001Circulation229 citations

Differential Impact on Survival of Electrocardiographic Q-Wave Versus Enzymatic Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Intervention

View Full Paper
GSGregg W. StoneRMRoxana MehranGDGeorge Dangas

Key Result

Periprocedural development of new Q waves after percutaneous intervention was a powerful independent determinant of death (2-year mortality 38.3%; HR 9.9; P<0.0001).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=7,147)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does the type of periprocedural myocardial infarction (Q-wave vs enzymatic) impact survival in patients undergoing elective percutaneous intervention?

P
Population
7147 consecutive patients undergoing elective percutaneous intervention of 12 098 lesions at a tertiary referral center.
I
Intervention
Elective percutaneous intervention (stents, atheroablation, or PTCA alone)
O
Outcome
Death (2-year mortality)hard clinical

Large periprocedural infarctions, indicated by new Q waves or CPK-MB >8× ULN, are powerful predictors of mortality after elective percutaneous intervention, whereas lesser CPK-MB elevations do not adversely affect survival.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 9.9

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

Background — The relative prognostic importance of ECG myocardial infarction (MI) after intervention compared with varying degrees of enzymatic elevation has not been characterized, and the device-specific implications of periprocedural MI are also unknown. Methods and Results — Serial creatine phosphokinase (CPK)-MB levels were determined after elective percutaneous intervention of 12 098 lesions in 7147 consecutive patients at a tertiary referral center. Procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up data were collected by independent research nurses, and clinical and ECG events were adjudicated by a separate committee. Stents were implanted in 50.6% of lesions, atheroablation was performed in 54.8%, and PTCA alone was performed in 9.8%. The peak periprocedural CPK-MB level was >3× the upper limit of normal (ULN) in 17.9% of patients, and Q-wave MI developed in 0.6%. By multivariate analysis, the periprocedural development of new Q waves was the most powerful independent determinant of death (2-year mortality rate, 38.3%; hazard ratio, 9.9; P 8× ULN was also a strong predictor of death (2-year mortality rate, 16.3%; hazard ratio, 2.2; P 8×ULN) are powerful determinants of death, whereas lesser degrees of CPK-MB release and specific device use do not adversely affect survival.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stone et al. (2001) conducted a cohort in Elective percutaneous intervention (n=7,147). Periprocedural Q-wave myocardial infarction vs. No Q-wave MI or lesser degrees of CPK-MB elevation was evaluated on Death (HR 9.9, p=<0.0001). Periprocedural development of new Q waves after percutaneous intervention was a powerful independent determinant of death (2-year mortality 38.3%; HR 9.9; P<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4a62fb8c7be8ffba64dfhttps://doi.org/10.1161/hc3101.093902
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper