PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

B44-11 Newborn Screening in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
EFE FarrellDFD FraughenRFR Fay

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate pilot and feasibility studies on newborn screening for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and understand its implications.
  • Conducted systematic search in databases including PubMed and Cochrane from 1963 to 2025.
  • Included only studies assessing newborn screening for AATD at local or population levels.
  • Two reviewers independently screened studies and appraised methodological quality.
  • Identified 13 relevant papers, including 3 with longitudinal follow-up of NBS-positive children.
  • Lower smoking rates and respiratory disease in children identified via newborn screening in follow-up studies.
  • NBS found to be an inexpensive and effective strategy for AATD detection with adequate specificity and sensitivity.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is an inherited condition caused by a spectrum of SERPINA1 gene variants, resulting in insufficient levels of circulating alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protein, conferring varying risks of emphysema and liver disease. AATD remains underdiagnosed, with lung-index(symptomatic) patients commonly exhibiting established, irreversible lung disease at diagnosis. Studies from our group have shown significant rates of obstruction even in our family-screened populations (56% with an FEV1/FVC 0.7, range (22-91%), highlighting a critical need for earlier detection. Awareness of a pre-existing genetic susceptibility will allow individuals to make informed lifestyle choices to minimise their lifetime risk of disease development.Newborn screening (NBS) has been recommended by the WHO, but uncertainty remains about the feasibility of implementing large-scale newborn screening programmes. We will examine newborn screening (NBS) studies in AATD carried out to date, and reconsider its validity in the modern AATD landscape. Aims To systematically identify and synthesise pilot and feasibility studies evaluating newborn screening for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, with a focus on implementation barriers, benefits, and reported outcomes. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane databases was conducted from 1963 to 2025. Eligible studies included pilot, feasibility, or implementation projects assessing NBS for AATD, either at a local or population level. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised methodological quality. Owing to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes, results were synthesised narratively. Results 13 papers were identified and critically analysed. 3 papers performed longitudinal follow-up of children with AATD identified via NBS and are included as a sub-analysis. Significantly lower rates of smoking, and consequently respiratory disease, were seen in longitudinal follow-up studies of NBS cohorts. Conclusions NBS for AATD provides an opportunity for disease-modifying lifestyle changes. Multiple studies found NBS to be an inexpensive strategy for AATD detection, with acceptable specificity and sensitivity.Arguments against NBS in AATD historically focused on the paucity of treatment, lack of knowledge of the natural history of the disease and familial psychological stress. The majority of these studies were conducted in the 1970s and 1980s.The intervening decades have seen huge advances in knowledge, genetic counselling, the introduction of augmentation therapy and exciting novel therapeutics, including gene editing, are presently being trialed. The WHO has recommended the introduction of NBS for AATD and this review will discuss the potential for such a programme in Ireland, particularly given the high prevalence of AATD in Ireland. This abstract is funded by: Alpha-1 Foundation

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Farrell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4ee2f03e14405aa9a1c9https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.1806
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper