Retrospective analysis compares treatment outcomes of molecular radiotherapy in young individuals and adults, suggesting advantages of 177Lu-DOTATATE.
Background Malignant phaeochromocytomas-(PCCs) and paragangliomas-(PGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumours and evidence guiding the selection of systemic molecular radiotherapy-(MRT) remains limited. 131I-MIBG and 177Lu-DOTATATE are commonly used following surgery. This study compared treatment outcomes between children/young-adolescents-(<21years; CYA) and adults-(>21years). Method A retrospective analysis was conducted to record patient characteristics, tumour features, treatment details, and MRT administered. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival-(OS) and progression-free survival-(PFS). Results Fifty-one patients were included (CYA n=15; adults n=36), Mean age at presentation was 13.4 years in CYAs and 47.7 years in adults. Surgical resection was performed in 81% of CYA PGLs and 75% of PCCs (R0/R1:44% and 100%), and in 95% of adult PGLs and 92% of PCCs (R0/R1:59% and 75%). Bone and lung metastases were the most frequent metastatic sites. No statistically significant differences were observed in OS or PFS between ¹³¹I-MIBG and 177Lu-DOTATATE. However, analysis consistently favoured 177Lu-DOTATATE, particularly in PGLs. In CYA-PGL patients, 177Lu-DOTATATE demonstrated longer median OS (4.5 vs 3.5yrs) and PFS (4.5 vs 1.8yrs) compared with MIBG. In Adult PGLs, median OS was similar (3.0yrs each), while 177Lu-DOTATATE showed longer PFS (3.0 vs 2.5yrs). Conclusion Surgical resection was frequently incomplete in both groups with metastatic PGLs. Although 177Lu-DOTATATE is not currently approved by NICE for metastatic PCCs/PGLs, it demonstrated consistently longer OS and PFS than 131I-MIBG, particularly in PGLs. These findings support a potential therapeutic advantage of 177Lu-DOTATATE over 131I-mIBG, though benefits in PCCs remain less clear due to smaller treated numbers and the absence of statistically significant differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsarrani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: