Evaluates adherence and persistence of cabotegravir HIV PrEP in diverse populations, indicating high usage but limited uptake.
Background: Long-acting cabotegravir (CAB-LA) was approved as HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the U.S. in December 2021, but data are limited on uptake, adherence, and persistence in clinical practice. Methods: We extracted electronic health records of adults receiving oral or injectable PrEP during December 2021-June 2024 at Kaiser Permanente (KP) Northern California and Mid-Atlantic States, two large integrated healthcare systems. We used chi-square tests to compare characteristics of CAB-LA users and oral-PrEP-only users. Among CAB-LA users, we assessed adherence to bimonthly injections after lead-in doses (weeks 0 and 4) and used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate persistence. Results: Among 23,311 individuals accessing oral or injectable PrEP, 180 (0.8%) received CAB-LA, with 23.9% having no documentation of prior PrEP use at KP. Compared with oral-PrEP-only users, a lower proportion of CAB-LA users were commercially insured (82.2% vs 89.2%; P =0.014) and a higher proportion were Black (18.9% vs 10.2%) or Hispanic (34.4% vs 23.6%; P <0.001 across race/ethnicity categories). Of 688 non-lead-in CAB-LA injections, 90.4% were administered within 8 weeks +7 days after the prior injection. Persistence on CAB-LA was 87.9% and 74.9% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There were no incident HIV infections during CAB-LA use. Conclusions: CAB-LA is engaging new users, including populations traditionally underrepresented in PrEP uptake, and adherence and persistence are high in clinical practice. However, uptake of CAB-LA is extremely low, suggesting population impact will be limited without efforts to expand implementation and use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Traeger et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: