PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery0 citations

Advantages of the Pfannenstiel Incision in Laparoscopic and Robotic‐Assisted Surgery for colon cancer: A Propensity‐Score‐Matched Analysis

View Full Paper
KTKazunori TejimaMHMasayuki HirakiAAAsami Arita

Key Points

  • This study investigates the short-term surgical outcomes of the Pfannenstiel incision compared to the umbilical incision in colon cancer surgery.
  • Retrospective analysis of postoperative outcomes in 103 patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic colon cancer surgery.
  • Used a 1:1 propensity-score-matched analysis based on sex, age, tumor location, and tumor size.
  • Pain was assessed using the visual analog scale on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 5.
  • In the matched cohort of 24 patients per group, the frequency of analgesic use was significantly lower in the Pfannenstiel group (p < 0.01).
  • Sequential VAS scores on postoperative days 1 and 2 were significantly lower in the Pfannenstiel group (two-way ANOVA: p < 0.05).
  • There were no significant differences in the incidence of incisional hernia between groups.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim This study aimed to investigate the short‐term surgical outcomes of the Pfannenstiel incision, which is being increasingly used with the expansion of robotic surgery, compared with those of the conventional umbilical incision in colon cancer surgery. Methods Postoperative outcomes were assessed in 103 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colon cancer surgery with intracorporeal anastomosis at our hospital between May 2022 and May 2024. The data were retrospectively analyzed. The Pfannenstiel incision was performed in 73 patients (P group), and the umbilical incision was performed in 30 patients (U group). A 1:1 propensity‐score‐matched analysis was performed (matching criteria: sex, age, tumor location, and tumor size) using a caliper width of 0.3. We used the visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative days (PODs) 0, 1, 2, and 5 and the postoperative frequency of analgesics to assess pain. Results The matched cohort comprised 24 patients in each group. The frequency of analgesic use ( p < 0.01) and sequential VAS scores on PODs 1 and 2 (two‐way ANOVA: p < 0.05) were significantly lower in the P group than in the U group. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of incisional hernia. Conclusion The Pfannenstiel incision may reduce postoperative pain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tejima et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f19f03e14405aa9a57ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/ases.70313
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Low Transverse Pfannenstiel Incision and the Prevalence of Incisional Hernia and Nerve Entrapment1997 · 214 citations
  2. 2Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial2005 · 2,332 citations
  3. 3Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer2010 · 60 citations
  4. 4Robotic versus standard laparoscopic elective colectomy: where are the benefits?2017 · 45 citations
  5. 5The incidence of extraction site incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis2022 · 41 citations