Retrospective cohort study evaluates PICU utilization among children with medical complexity from non-English speaking families, highlighting disparities.
Objectives: Children with medical complexity (CMC) account for a disproportionate share of PICU utilization. Children from families speaking languages other than English (LOE) face barriers that may influence critical-care needs. We sought to evaluate the intersection of language and PICU utilization of CMC. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large quaternary children’s hospital in the United States, from 2015 to 2022. Patients: CMC, defined as having two or more body systems involved in a complex chronic condition (CCC), admitted to a children’s hospital. Patient family language categorized as English, Spanish, or languages other than English or Spanish (LOES). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: We identified 3096 unique CMC (54% male) accounting for 9297 hospital encounters (mean age 8.2 yr). Among patient families, 7.2% had a preferred LOE, with 2.7% speaking Spanish and 4.6% speaking LOES. Around one-third (35%) of patients had a PICU admission during at least one encounter. Mixed-effects regressions with patient-specific random effects were used to model associations. LOES was associated with greater odds of PICU admission (adjusted odds ratio 1.58; 95% CI, 1.1–2.2) and longer PICU length of stay (incidence-rate ratio 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7–3.5) after adjusting for age, sex, race, Child Opportunity Index (COI) and the number of CCC. Conclusions: In patients admitted to our children’s hospital (2015–2022), the CMC from families speaking a LOES represented a vulnerable subgroup, with associated greater odds of PICU admission and longer stays. These disparities persisted after accounting for CCCs and COI. Timely, language-concordant communication—especially for less common languages–may mitigate aspects of critical care admission in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pitkowsky et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: