Key result
A 6-week home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program significantly improved CAT scores (-6.47, p<0.001) and mMRC dyspnea scale (-0.53, p=0.024) in Filipino COPD patients.
Why the study?
Access to center-based pulmonary rehabilitation remains limited in low-resource and rural settings, making home-based programs a promising alternative.
Does a 6-week home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program improve exercise capacity, dyspnea, and health status in Filipino patients with COPD?
Observational (n=17)
Does a 6-week home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program improve exercise capacity, dyspnea, and health status in Filipino patients with COPD?
A 6-week home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program in Filipino COPD patients was safe and significantly improved dyspnea and health status, though improvements in exercise capacity were not statistically significant.
Rationale Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based intervention that improves exercise capacity, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, access to center-based programs remains limited in low-resource and rural settings. Home-based PR offers a promising alternative. The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a minimally supervised, home-based PR program on exercise capacity, dyspnea, and health status in Filipino COPD patients. Secondary objectives included assessment of adverse events and adherence. Methods A prospective, single-arm, pre-post pilot study was conducted from October 2024 to April 2025.Participants completed a 6-week home-based PR program guided by instructional videos delivered in the Filipino language. The intervention included warm-up, inspiratory muscle training, resistance training, and cool-down exercises, performed at least twice weekly. Outcomes included 6-minute walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Adherence and step counts were monitored using diaries and wearable devices. Paired t-tests evaluated pre- and post-intervention differences. Results Seventeen participants completed the program (mean age 71.9 ± 10.96 years). While the improvement in 6MWT distance was not statistically significant (+24.29 meters, p = .057), significant reductions were observed in CAT scores (-6.47, p < .001) and mMRC dyspnea scale (-0.53, p = .024). All participants achieved the CAT minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and 35.3% met the MCID for both 6MWT and mMRC dyspnea scale. Overall adherence to the program was high, with only one participant withdrawn due to noncompliance. Conclusion A minimally supervised, home-based PR program delivered in the Filipino language was safe and associated with clinically meaningful improvements in dyspnea and health status. These findings underscore the potential of home -based culturally adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programs to improve care delivery in resource-limited settings. Further validation through larger, controlled studies is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=17). Minimally supervised, home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program was evaluated on 6-minute walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) (CAT -6.47; mMRC -0.53; 6MWT +24.29m, p=<0.001 (CAT); 0.024 (mMRC); 0.057 (6MWT)). A 6-week home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program significantly improved CAT scores (-6.47, p<0.001) and mMRC dyspnea scale (-0.53, p=0.024) in Filipino COPD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: