PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

B24-02 Real-world Effectiveness of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate on COPD Exacerbations and Healthcare Costs by Eosinophil Level: Results From the U.S. ARCTOS Study

View Full Paper
SSS SethiHGH D GermackLGL Gozalo

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate in reducing COPD exacerbations and healthcare costs based on blood eosinophil levels.
  • Conducted a retrospective database analysis using Medicare Fee-for-Service and the Inovalon MORE2 Registry® from 1/1/2021-3/31/2024.
  • Included patients with COPD aged 40+ who started treatment with BGF and had available eosinophil data.
  • Assessed changes in exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs from baseline to follow-up.
  • Among patients with eosinophils ≥100 cells/µL, total exacerbations decreased by 28.7%, severe by 40.0%.
  • Mean costs related to severe exacerbations declined by 39.2%, from $2,746 to $1,670 (P < 0.05).
  • Approximately 90% of patients experienced no severe exacerbation after BGF initiation.

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Real-world evidence supports the benefits of COPD maintenance treatment with triple therapy, including single-inhaler budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF), however limited data exist on how outcomes vary by patient blood eosinophil levels—a potential biomarker for treatment response and exacerbation risk. This study assessed changes in COPD exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs following BGF initiation stratified by patient blood eosinophil level amongst GOLD E patients. Methods This retrospective database analysis utilized the 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service and Inovalon MORE2 Registry® of closed claims spanning 1/1/2021-3/31/2024. Inclusion criteria included: 1) prescription claim for BGF and ≥1 refill (earliest prescription claim=index date) ; 2) 12 months of health plan enrollment preceding (baseline) and following (follow-up) index; 3) ≥1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims with diagnosis of COPD during study period; 4) age 40+ years on index; 5) absence of cancer and other select respiratory diseases; and 6) presence of ≥ 1 severe or ≥ 2 moderate COPD exacerbations during baseline. Moderate and severe exacerbations were identified using published algorithms, and COPD exacerbation-related HCRU and costs were calculated based on claims during an exacerbation period (length of hospital stay for severe; length of treatment for moderate). Patients were stratified by blood eosinophil levels; the percent change in COPD exacerbations, HCRU, and costs were assessed from baseline to follow-up. Results 393 patients with COPD treated with BGF and with available blood eosinophil data were included (17. 8% of the ARCTOS study). Mean±SD age was 68. 7±10. 5 years; 64. 6% female, 77. 9% White. Blood eosinophil cohorts were as follows: n = 70 (17. 8%) 100 cells/µL; n = 184 (46. 8%) 100-300 cells/µL; n = 139 (35. 4%) ≥300 cells/µL. Among patients with eosinophils ≥100 cells/µL (82. 2%), the annual rate of total, moderate, and severe COPD exacerbations decreased 28. 7%, 27. 7%, and 40. 0%, respectively, following BGF initiation (Table). Similar trends were observed across other eosinophil subgroups, including reductions in severe exacerbations of 50. 0% for patients with eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/µL. Mean severe exacerbation-related hospital-based costs decreased 39. 2% following BGF initiation among patients with eosinophil counts ≥100 cells/µL (2, 746 vs 1, 670, P 0. 05). Across cohorts, ∼90% of patients experienced no severe exacerbation following BGF initiation. Conclusions Patients with COPD treated with BGF demonstrated meaningful reductions in COPD exacerbations, HCRU, and costs in a real-world setting across different baseline eosinophil levels. BGF is an effective option to reduce exacerbations and healthcare costs, and can potentially inform clinical guidelines and future research. Results align with findings across eosinophil levels from the ETHOS trial. This abstract is funded by: AstraZeneca

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sethi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5013f03e14405aa9ba50https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.1761
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Real-World Outcomes across Baseline Risk Profiles in Patients with COPD Initiating Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate in Spain: Insights from the ORESTES Study2026
  2. 2Real-World Outcomes in Patients with COPD Initiating Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dehydrate in Spain: ORESTES Study2025 · 8 citations
  3. 3Benefits of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate on lung function and exacerbations of COPD: a post-hoc analysis of the KRONOS study by blood eosinophil level and exacerbation history2024 · 12 citations
  4. 4Prompt initiation of single-inhaler budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) following a COPD exacerbation reduces exacerbations and cardiopulmonary risk in patients with COPD: insights from the MITOS EROS+CP study in the United States2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Verification of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol (BGF) Triple Therapy in the Department of Cardiology: A Pilot Study2026