Phase 2 trial reveals immune components affecting outcomes of anti-PD-1 therapy in mccRCC, suggesting biomarker models may predict responsiveness.
PURPOSE: We investigated components of the immune tumor microenvironment as determinants of clinical outcome to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) treated with frontline nivolumab in the phase 2, non-randomized HCRN GU16-260 trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pre-treatment primary ccRCCs from 72 patients were analyzed by multiplex immunofluorescence and image analysis to assess non-terminally exhausted CD8+ (CD8⁺PD-1⁺TIM3⁻LAG3⁻) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), PD-1+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), total and peritumoral tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), and CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Clinical endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Densities of CD8⁺PD-1⁺TIM3⁻LAG3⁻ TILs, total and peritumoral TLS, and CD163⁺ TAMs, as continuous variables, were associated with improved ORR (Odds Ratio: 1.54 [1.10-2.16] for TILs; 1.18 [1.02-1.37] for total TLS; 1.10 [1.02-1.18] for peritumoral TLS; 2.21 [1.33-3.69] for TAMs) and longer PFS (Hazard Ratio: 0.79 [0.67-0.95] for TILs; 0.92 [0.85-0.99] for total TLS; 0.94 [0.90-0.98] for peritumoral TLS; 0.77 [0.61-0.97] for TAMs). Although % of PD-1+ Tregs as continuous variable was not associated with outcomes, at an optimal cut-off, high % of PD-1+ Tregs tended to be associated with lower ORR (12.5% vs 43.6%, p=0.093) and was associated with shorter PFS (3.4 vs 10.9 months, p<0.001). The biomarkers were not strongly correlated with each other and their integration in multi-biomarker models further stratified outcomes. CONCLUSION: Individual immune cell populations within the ccRCC microenvironment are associated with response/resistance to frontline anti-PD-1 therapy. Our findings support the development of combined immune marker models to identify patients with divergent outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: