Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced facial age estimation through multi-image learning and interaction techniques.
Despite the remarkable progress being made in the study of human facial age estimation, it is still a challenging problem. The main problem lies in the large intra-age appearance variations among different individuals. Sometimes, these variations can even exceed the inter-age appearance variations of the same individual. To address this problem, we construct a cross-identity image sequence for each query image and reformulate age estimation as a multi-image learning task. This provides a basis for learning common age-related cues across identities. Based on this formulation, we propose the Cross-Identity Interaction Transformer (CIIT) for age estimation. The CIIT first extracts multi-scale aging cues through a cross-scale embedding (CSE) module to preserve age evidence from fine textures to coarse structural changes. Secondly, to progressively enhance facial features and capture shared facial characteristics from cross-identity references, intra-image feature attention (IFA) and prior-guided axial cross-image attention (PG-ACIA) operate alternately within each Transformer block. IFA refines local age-discriminative representations within each image, while PG-ACIA uses multi-scale edge priors to guide cross-image interaction toward age-sensitive regions such as wrinkles. Finally, an anchored regression network (ARN) predicts age through a soft-weighted combination of multiple linear regressors for robust age estimation under diverse facial aging patterns. Experiments on four benchmark datasets, namely MORPH Album II, MegaAge-Asian, FG-NET and Adience, demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance across multiple evaluation metrics, validating the effectiveness of the CIIT in capturing shared facial characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: