Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Agentic trial demonstrates improved data management and analysis in scholarly contexts, suggesting a new framework for research tools.
Managing the rapidly growing scholarly corpus poses significant challenges in representation, reasoning, and efficient analysis. An ideal system should unify structured knowledge management, agentic planning, and interpretable execution to support diverse scholarly queries – from retrieval to knowledge discovery and generation – at scale. Unfortunately, existing RAG and document analytics systems fail to achieve all query types simultaneously. To this end, we propose AgenticScholar, an agentic scholarly data management system that integrates a structure-aware knowledge representation layer, an LLM-centric hybrid query planning layer, and a unified execution layer with composable operators. AgenticScholar autonomously translates natural language queries into executable DAG plans, enabling end-to-end reasoning over multi-modal scholarly data. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AgenticScholar significantly outperforms existing systems in effectiveness, efficiency, and interpretability, offering a practical foundation for future research on agentic scholarly data management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: