Key result
BMI-specific FEV1/FVC correction identifies ~7% new COPD cases associated with higher all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
The diagnosis of COPD by spirometric criteria is confounded by the effects of obesity on FEV1/FVC, leading to potential underdiagnosis in obese individuals.
Does a BMI-specific correction factor for FEV1/FVC improve the diagnosis of COPD in overweight and obese adults?
Cohort (n=12,790)
Does a BMI-specific correction factor for FEV1/FVC improve the diagnosis of COPD in overweight and obese adults?
Effect estimate: adjusted HR 1.26 (95% CI 0.99-1.61)
Applying a BMI-specific correction factor to FEV1/FVC increases the detection of COPD in overweight and obese individuals, identifying patients with worse clinical outcomes.
Newly labelled COPD was associated with higher mortality in obese adults; leaves open adoption of BMI correction factors for spirometry.
Introduction The diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by spirometric criteria is confounded by the effects of obesity on the FEV1/FVC ratio, resulting in potential underdiagnosis of COPD in obese individuals. We aimed to develop correction factors for FEV1/FVC in overweight and obese adults with COPD. Methods We developed BMI-specific correction factors for FEV1/FVC using data from healthy non-smoking subjects aged ≥40 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2012 (N = 2,658). After excluding a small number of individuals who were underweight (n = 16), subjects were stratified into four BMI categories based on standard obesity classifications: normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m²), obese (30.0-34.9 kg/m²), and severely obese (≥35.0 kg/m²). Within each BMI stratum, we employed the Lambda-Mu-Sigma (LMS) method using the Box-Cox Cole and Green distribution to estimate distributional parameters that account for skewness (L), central tendency (M), and coefficient of variation (S) of FEV1/FVC ratios. Correction factors were calculated as the ratio of each BMI category’s adjusted value to that of the reference normal BMI group. These BMI-specific correction factors were applied to the COPDGene cohort of current and former smokers (N = 10,132) by dividing observed FEV1/FVC by the corresponding correction factor. COPD classification was then reassessed using both the original FEV1/FVC <0.70 criterion and the BMI-corrected values to evaluate the impact of this adjustment on disease classification and subsequent clinical outcomes. Results The resulting correction factors for each BMI category were: 1.00 for Normal weight, 1.01 for Overweight, 1.02 for Obesity, and 1.04 for Severe Obesity. Application of the correction factors to COPDGene resulted in 338 (7%) participants newly meeting COPD criteria. On multivariable analyses, compared to participants without COPD, newly labelled participants had greater all-cause mortality (adjusted hazards ratio =1.26, 95%CI 0.99-1.61), more exacerbations (incidence rate ratio =1.07, 95%CI 0.87-1.34), worse quality of life (higher St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score =3.5, 95%CI 1.4-5.6), greater dyspnea (higher modified Medical Research Council score =1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.3), and lower 6-minute walk distance (-12 m, 95%CI -24 to -0.8). Conclusions Application of a correction factor based on weight category resulted in a significant increase in the detection of COPD. This abstract is funded by: NHLBI R01 HL151421.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (n=12,790). BMI-specific correction factors for FEV1/FVC vs. Original FEV1/FVC <0.70 criterion (participants without COPD) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (newly labelled COPD participants vs participants without COPD) (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.99-1.61). Applying BMI-specific correction factors for FEV1/FVC identified 338 (7%) new COPD cases, who had greater all-cause mortality (aHR 1.26; 95% CI 0.99-1.61) compared to those without COPD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: