Article suggests the Supreme Court overlooked key aspects of dishonesty in trust breach cases, indicating significant legal implications.
This article suggests that, with respect, the Supreme Court may have neglected the issue of ‘dishonesty’ in Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd v Stevens [2025] UKSC 28, [2025] 3 WLR 293, in relation to the ‘dishonest’ assistance of a breach of constructive trust found to have taken place. And that the judgment is another noteworthy and potentially revealing marker–albeit seemingly an inadvertent one—in equity’s controversial transition from ‘knowing assistance’ to ‘dishonest assistance’ of a breach of trust or breach of fiduciary duty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Wilde (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: