Study demonstrated improved oxygenation in an elderly female after PEEP adjustment and positioning, indicating effective management strategies.
Type A aortic dissection is a severe vascular condition frequently associated with cardiac and neurological complications as well as malperfusion syndromes. Surgical treatment, requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and mechanical ventilation, may cause ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) ratio mismatch. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) emerges as a noninvasive tool capable of identifying changes in pulmonary ventilation and perfusion. An 89-year-old female patient who was obese, hypertensive, and diabetic, with mild aortic regurgitation, underwent surgical repair of type A aortic dissection with CPB. In the immediate postoperative period, she developed extensive right pneumothorax and cardiogenic shock. Despite chest drainage, while under sedation and neuromuscular blockade (RASS -5) on protective volume-controlled ventilation (PEEP 6 cmH2O, FiO2100%, RR 22 bpm), she presented with static compliance of 32 mL/cmH2O, airway resistance of 13 cmH2O/L/s, PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 60, and diffuse pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiography. EIT assessment revealed a predominance of ventilatory disturbance (Right = 37%, Left = 63%). Based on this finding, EIT-guided PEEP titration was performed and adjusted to 10 cmH2O, combined with lateral positioning (right lung in the non-dependent position) for 2 hours, aiming to optimize ventilation and reduce hypoxemia. Following the intervention, oxygenation improved (PaO2/FiO2 ratio = 162), FiO2 was reduced to 75%, and ventilation distribution became more balanced (Right = 53%, Left = 47%). This case suggests that EIT was a valuable tool for diagnosing V/Q mismatch and monitoring its correction following individualized PEEP adjustment, and that when combined with therapeutic positioning, it promoted improvements in oxygenation and ventilatory distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porfirio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: