PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1 citations

Systemic electioneering from the evangelical pulpit: Evidence from a computational analysis

View Full Paper
MJMarc S. JacobUniversity of Notre DameYLYphtach LelkesCalifornia University of PennsylvaniaSWSamuel WolkenCalifornia University of Pennsylvania

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to quantify political speech in evangelical sermons and assess its potential impact on democratic governance.
  • Analyzed 88,546 sermons from predominantly evangelical churches spanning various election cycles and a control period.
  • Examined direct political advocacy and endorsements, focusing on geographic trends in relation to county partisan composition.
  • Used a computational approach to assess sermon content for electoral involvement.
  • 14.7% of churches engaged in political advocacy during the three months surrounding the 2024 election.
  • Political mobilization peaked at 3.5% on the Sunday before Election Day.
  • Advocacy rates were similar in swing and safe states, indicating a lack of strategic targeting.

Abstract

Religious institutions’ engagement in prohibited electoral advocacy is a growing concern for democratic governance. In the United States, such mobilization has been especially visible within the evangelical movement. We examine this phenomenon using a corpus of 88,546 sermons from predominantly evangelical churches, transcribed from 63,683 h of Sunday services spanning the 2020, 2022, and 2024 election cycles and a nonelection control period. Analysis of this corpus reveals that direct political advocacy and endorsements are widespread: 14.7% of churches engaged in this speech during the three months surrounding the 2024 election. This behavior follows a clear electoral rhythm, peaking on the Sunday before Election Day, when 3.5% of churches mobilized. Geographic analysis indicates that advocacy correlates with county partisan composition but lacks strategic targeting; rates in swing states are indistinguishable from those in safe states. Our results provide large-scale quantification of political speech from American pulpits that constitutes prohibited electioneering under current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidelines, revealing a pattern of base mobilization driven by local partisan context rather than national electoral strategy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jacob et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d50f3f03e14405aa9d0f1https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2603911123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us2011 · 845 citations
  2. 2When to Preach About Poverty: How Location, Race, and Ideology Shape White Evangelical Sermons2023 · 16 citations
  3. 3Reconsidering the Role of Politics in Leaving Religion: The Importance of Affiliation2017 · 74 citations
  4. 4Politics and preaching: how religious elites justify addressing or avoiding political topics2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Political Christianity: A Contextual Analysis1992 · 86 citations