PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Mathematics0 citationsOpen Access

Quantitative Analysis of the Reciprocity Gap Dichotomy for Inclusions with Variable Conductivity

View Full Paper
MCMichele Di Cristo

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze the reciprocity gap method concerning variable conductivity and its dichotomy in approximations.
  • Investigated discrete approximations for sampling points in inclusions with variable conductivity.
  • Regularized an ill-conditioned linear system using Tikhonov regularization with L2(∂D) constraints.
  • Applied the L-curve criterion to select regularization parameters.
  • Exterior sampling points showed approximately exponential growth of ∥vN(z)∥L2(∂D) with harmonic order N.
  • Interior points remained bounded regardless of contrast variation.
  • Quantified behaviors through fitted growth rates and contrast indicators, influenced by geometric and model parameters.

Abstract

We study the quantitative structure of the reciprocity gap method for inclusions with spatially varying conductivity. Motivated by the variable-coefficient reciprocity gap identity, we investigate the discrete approximation mechanism underlying the bounded/blow-up dichotomy for sampling points inside and outside the inclusion. The reciprocity gap functional is discretized by harmonic test functions, and the resulting ill-conditioned linear system is regularized by a Tikhonov term consistent with the L2(∂D) trace norm appearing in the weighted formulation. The regularization parameter is selected by the L-curve criterion. For constant, radially varying, and angularly oscillating contrasts, the numerical results show that exterior sampling points exhibit an approximately exponential growth of ∥vN(z)∥L2(∂D) with respect to the harmonic order N, whereas interior points remain bounded. This behavior is quantified through fitted growth rates and contrast indicators, and its dependence on geometry and model parameters is examined. The results provide a quantitative description of the reciprocity gap approximation mechanism in heterogeneous media and show that the bounded/blow-up dichotomy remains numerically detectable beyond the constant-coefficient setting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michele Di Cristo (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d50f3f03e14405aa9d1f0https://doi.org/10.3390/math14101717
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Identification of planar cracks by complete overdetermined data: inversion formulae1996 · 166 citations
  2. 2A simple method for solving inverse scattering problems in the resonance region1996 · 673 citations
  3. 3Reciprocity principle and crack identification1999 · 106 citations
  4. 4The linear sampling method for anisotropic media2002 · 112 citations
  5. 5Analysis of two linear sampling methods applied to electromagnetic imaging of buried objects2006 · 96 citations