Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates predictions of Vacuon Gravity model in elastic spacetime structure, suggesting new insights into cosmology.
Vacuon Gravity (VG) v6.2 models spacetime as a face-centred-cubic (FCC) elastic lattice with spacing ℓv = 2√(ln 2) ℓP ≈ 2.691 × 10−35 m, fixed by the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy condition. This version strengthens v6.1 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.20062403) with advances in geometry, baryogenesis, dark energy, and document architecture. Primary falsifiable predictions (unchanged from v6.1):ns = 1 − α² ≈ 0.9711 | r/nT = −0.055 (vs −8 for inflation) | ηB = 5.88 × 10−10New prediction: ηL = 0 (no leptogenesis), testable via neutrinoless double-beta decay. New in v6.2 relative to v6.1: Geometry (A9, Tier C→A): Roe C*-algebra for the z=12 regular random graph gives ind(DVG) = 0 via coarse invariance (Tier A). Spectral scan of 8000 k-points: ΔEFT ≥ 0.40, no accidental near-zero modes, MR ≥ 3.4 × 1017 GeV (Tier A*). Baryogenesis (A31b, A32b, Tier B chain): Qℤ₂ = B mod 2 promoted to Tier A* via exact Abelian AB theorem (character factorisation: χq1·χq2 = χq1+q2, algebraic). nf = 10/13 dominant-balance derivation consolidated at Tier B; near-core energy integrability is proved (exponent −11/13 > −1 for all m > 0). Overall ηB chain: Tier B. New prediction: ηL = 0 (no leptogenesis, Tier B*). Dark energy (appD, DESI DR2 March 2025): VG predicts w0 = −1.027 (phantom regime); DESI DR2 prefers w0 > −1 (quintessence). 2D tension 3.2–4.9σ depending on supernovae dataset (correlation r = −0.90). Modular structure: a dark energy falsification would leave the GR, CMB, and baryogenesis sectors unaffected. NEC stability of phantom w0 < −1: Tier C open. Document architecture: 75 appendix files reorganised into 9 thematic collector files (≤ 100 lines each); no source file exceeds 1000 lines. Cross-references and phantom-label stubs unchanged. Honest tier corrections: βs = 0 within constant-α approximation (not exact); fNLequil = O(−1) downgraded to Tier C (bispectrum not computed); Wilson factorisation confirmed Tier B (numerical bound at κ = 189.6, not analytic); nf = 10/13 confirmed Tier B dominant balance (Frobenius analysis of nonlinear ODE = Tier C open). Tier summary v6.2: A = 77, A* = 24, B = 41, B* = 8, C = 0, D = 10 (v6.1: A = 76, A* = 19, B = 41, B* = 6, C = 0, D = 10).Tier counts are qualitative epistemic bookkeeping, not statistical confidence measures. Version history:v1.0: doi:10.5281/zenodo.19210532 | v2.0: doi:10.5281/zenodo.19376008 | v3.0: doi:10.5281/zenodo.19506878 | v4.1: doi:10.5281/zenodo.19630576 | v5.2: doi:10.5281/zenodo.19923398 | v6.1: doi:10.5281/zenodo.20062403
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maurizio CHIEI GAMACCHIO (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: