Key result
PP-36 reduced arrhythmia score (6.33 vs 14.17, P<0.05), infarct size (38.9 vs 44.9, P<0.05), and mortality (0% vs 17%) compared to vehicle in a rat ischemia/reperfusion injury model.
Why the study?
Does PP-36 reduce ischemia/reperfusion injury and arrhythmias in a rat model of coronary artery occlusion?
Does PP-36 reduce ischemia/reperfusion injury and arrhythmias in a rat model of coronary artery occlusion?
PP-36 is a newly synthesized β-adrenoceptor antagonist that demonstrates potent anti-arrhythmic and cardioprotective effects against ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats.
Does not support clinical use; leaves open translation of PP-36 effects to human ischemia/reperfusion injury.
The present study was performed to evaluate the cardioprotective effects and pharmacological characterization of newly synthesized β-adrenoreceptor antagonists 3-(3-tert-butylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (PP-36) in the rat model of coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion. Pre-ischemic administration (20 minutes before coronary occlusion) of PP-36 showed cardioprotective effects against ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. PP-36 (6 mg kg(-1)) significantly reduced arrhythmia score (6.33 ± 0.55, P < 0.05), infarct size/left ventricle size (38.9 ± 3.2, P < 0.05) and no mortality compared to vehicle-treated control group (14.17 ± 1.83, 44.9 ± 4.6 and 17% respectively). In-vitro studies in rat isolated right atria, guinea-pig trachea and rat distal colon preparations, were carried out to investigate the potency of PP-36 towards different β-adrenoceptor subtypes. pA2/pKB values of PP-36 for β1-β2-and β3-adrenoceptors were 6.904 ± 0.190, 6.44 ± 0.129 and 5.773 ± 0.129, respectively. In conclusion, PP-36 is a β-adrenoceptor antagonist possessing potent anti-arrhythmic and cardioprotective effects against ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lokesh Kumar Bhatt (2010) studied this question. PP-36 reduced arrhythmia score (6.33 vs 14.17, P<0.05), infarct size (38.9 vs 44.9, P<0.05), and mortality (0% vs 17%) compared to vehicle in a rat ischemia/reperfusion injury model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: