PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 2, 1979New England Journal of Medicine593 citations

Exercise Stress Testing

View Full Paper
DWDonald A. WeinerTRThomas J. RyanCMCarolyn H. McCabe

Key Result

Exercise stress testing had a higher false-positive rate in women than men (53% vs 12%, P<0.001), but this difference was not seen when matched for coronary artery disease prevalence.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=2,045)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing for predicting coronary-artery disease depend on the pre-test prevalence of the disease in men and women with chest pain?

P
Population
1465 men and 580 women (total n=2045) from a multicentered clinical trial with chest pain and varying pre-test risk (prevalence of coronary-artery disease) ranging from 7 to 87 percent.
I
Intervention
Exercise stress testing
C
Comparator
Coronary arteriography (reference standard)
O
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of stress testing (influence of pre-test prevalence of coronary-artery disease on test performance)

The ability of exercise stress testing to predict coronary artery disease is limited and highly dependent on the pre-test probability of disease, which varies by sex and chest pain classification.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 12% vs 53%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

To determine to what extent the diagnostic accuracy of stress testing is influenced by the prevalence of coronary-artery disease, we correlated the description of chest pain, the result of stress testing and the results of coronary arteriography in 1465 men and 580 women from a multicentered clinical trial. The pre-test risk (prevalence of coronary-artery disease) varied from 7 to 87 per cent, depending on sex and classification of chest pain. A positive stress test increased the pre-test risk by only 6 to 20 per cent, whereas a negative test decreased the risk by only 2 to 28 per cent. Aothough the percentage of false-positive results differed between men and women (12 +/- 1 per cent versus 53 +/- 3 per cent P less than 0.001), this difference was not seen in a subgroup matched for prevalence of coronary-artery disease. We conclude that the ability of stress testing to predict coronary-artery disease is limited in a heterogeneous population in which the prevalence of disease can be estimated through classification of chest pain and the sex of the patient.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weiner et al. (1979) conducted an observational in Coronary-artery disease (n=2,045). Exercise stress testing vs. Coronary arteriography was evaluated on False-positive results of stress testing (men vs women) (p=<0.001). Exercise stress testing had a higher false-positive rate in women than men (53% vs 12%, P<0.001), but this difference was not seen when matched for coronary artery disease prevalence.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d642748a82a5ce309b6d1https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197908023010502
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper