Key result
LA triangular plasty is linked to a ~20 mm reduction in late LA diameter.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the possibilities of the left atrium triangular plasty procedure during correction of combined mitral-aortal failure complicated by left-sided atriomegaly.
Does left atrium triangular plasty improve left atrium morphometry in patients undergoing surgical correction of combined mitral-aortal failure with left-sided atriomegaly?
Cohort (n=360)
No
Does left atrium triangular plasty improve left atrium morphometry in patients undergoing surgical correction of combined mitral-aortal failure with left-sided atriomegaly?
Left atrium triangular plasty during correction of combined mitral-aortic failure effectively reduces left atrial diameter and improves morphometry without significantly increasing mortality.
May support plasty for LA reduction in valve surgery; leaves open randomized confirmation of clinical benefit.
Objective. Studying of possibilities of the left atrium triangular plasty procedure in correction of combined mitral-aortal failure, complicated by the left-sided atriomegaly. Materials and methods. Into the analysis the results of surgical treatment in 360 patients, suffering combined mitral-aortal failure, combined with left-sided atriomegaly, who were operated in Amosov National Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery through period from 01.01.2006 to 01.01.2021 yr, were included. In the main group, consisting of 73 patients, original procedure of the left atrium triangular plasty was performed while correcting a combined mitral-aortal failure. In the control group, consisting of 287 patients, correction of combined mitral-aortal failure in presence of concomitant left-sided atriomegaly was performed only. Results. Of 73 operated patients of the main group 3 died (lethality have constituted 4.1%). Dynamics of echocardiographic indices in the main group of patients in accordance to stagesof treatment was following: definitely-systolic index of the left ventricle – (69.1 ± 12.1) ml/m2 preoperatively, (59.3 ± 8.5) ml/m2 postoperatively, (48.4 ± 9.5) ml/m2 in late period; the ejection fraction of the left ventricle – 0.51 ± 0.05 preoperatively, 0.54 ± 0.05 postoperatively, 0.56 ± 0.04 in late period. Diameter of the left atrium – (65.8 ± 4.1) mm preoperatively, (52.3 ± 2.1) mm postoperatively, (53.5 ± 2.2) mm in late period. Of 287 operated patients of control group 9 died (lethality have constituted 3.1%). Dynamics of echocardiographic indices in the main group patients on the treatment stages was following: definitely-systolic index of the left ventricle – (68.3 ± 11.3) ml/m2 preoperatively, (60.4 ± 9.3) ml/m2 postoperatively, (52.7 ± 7.2) ml/m2 in late period; the ejection fraction of the left ventricle – 0.52 ± 0.05 preoperatively, 0.53 ± 0.05 postoperatively, 0.5 ± 0.04 in late period. Diameter of the left atrium – (66.5 ± 3.7) mm preoperatively, (64.5 ±3.3) mm postoperatively, (73.5 ± 2.8) in late follow-up period. Conclusion. While performing operation for the left-sided atriomegaly the correction of triangular plasty of the left atrium constitutes a mini-invasive and effective procedure, leading to significant improvement in the left atrium morphometry and accompanied by low risk of lethality as well as thromboembolic complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Попов et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Combined mitral-aortal failure complicated by left-sided atriomegaly (n=360). Left atrium triangular plasty vs. Correction of combined mitral-aortal failure only was evaluated on Lethality. Left atrium triangular plasty during correction of combined mitral-aortal failure reduced late left atrium diameter (53.5 mm vs 73.5 mm) with 4.1% lethality compared to 3.1% in controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: