Key result
Mitral valve repair techniques dominate the 100 most cited papers in mitral valve surgery.
Why the study?
Bibliometric analysis can evaluate research performance and identify the most influential papers, institutions, and authors guiding current management in mitral valve surgery.
This bibliometric analysis identifies the 100 most influential papers in mitral valve surgery, highlighting key trends such as the shift towards percutaneous and minimally invasive techniques.
This study is an analysis of the 100 most cited articles in mitral valve surgery. A bibliometric analysis is a tool to evaluate research performance in a given field. It uses the number of times a publication is cited by others as a proxy marker of its impact. The most cited paper Carpentier et al. discusses mitral valve repair in terms of restoring the geometry of the entire valve rather than simply narrowing the annulus (Carpentier, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86:23-37, 1983). The first successful mitral valve repair was performed by Elliot Cutler at Brigham and Women's Hospital in 1923 (Cohn et al., Ann Cardiothorac Surg 4:315, 2015). More recently percutaneous and minimally invasive techniques that were originally designed as an option for high risk patients are being trialled in other patient groups (Hajar, Heart Views 19:160-3, 2018). Comparison of percutaneous method with open repair represents an expanding area of research (Hajar, Heart Views 19:160-3, 2018). This study will analyse the top 100 cited papers relevant to mitral valve surgery, identifying the most influential papers that guide current management, the institutions that produce them and the authors involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (2020) conducted a review in Mitral valve surgery (n=100). Bibliometric analysis was evaluated on Number of citations. Bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited papers in mitral valve surgery demonstrated that articles describing repair techniques are the most influential, led by Carpentier's paper with 1348 citations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: