The problem in treating incidental carcinoma of the prostate is that of distinguishing between tumors that will have a long, benign natural history and those that will progress rapidly. A review of the English literature concerning incidental prostatic carcinoma reveals that patients with focal low grade tumors have a good prognosis, while patients with high grade lesions often suffer rapid tumor progression. By contrast, the clinical significance of high volume, low grade tumor is unknown. A method has been developed to evaluate the distribution of prostatic cancer using 4-quadrant transurethral prostatic resection. A detailed method for staging these cancers based on a comprehensive, segmental histopathological analysis also is presented. A precise definition of the stages of prostatic cancer should eventually improve our understanding of the natural history of this disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheldon et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: