Key result
Three upcoming trials aim to determine if early TEVAR benefits uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.
Why the study?
Data are limited on whether early intervention with thoracic endografting in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection promotes aortic remodeling and better long-term outcomes, as prior trials have not conclusively shown a benefit.
Does early intervention with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) improve aortic remodeling and long-term outcomes compared to optimal medical therapy in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection?
Does early intervention with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) improve aortic remodeling and long-term outcomes compared to optimal medical therapy in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection?
Three major new randomized trials (SUNDAY, IMPROVE-AD, EARNEST) are recruiting to provide conclusive evidence on whether early TEVAR benefits patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection compared to optimal medical therapy.
Evidence for early TEVAR in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection remains inconclusive; these trials will provide definitive data.
The mainstay of management for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection is currently optimal medical therapy, targeting blood pressure and heart rate, along with serial imaging. There is a paucity of data that informs whether early intervention with thoracic endografting in this group of patients will promote aortic remodeling and better long-term outcomes. Investigations to date, including the Investigation of Stent Grafts in Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD), INSTEAD-XL, and Acute Dissection: Stent Graft or Best Medical Therapy (ADSORB) studies, have compared thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with optimal medical therapy in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection but have not shown a benefit for TEVAR conclusively. We discuss three major new randomized trials, which will recruit concurrently in Scandinavia (the Scandinavian trial of uncomplicated aortic dissection therapy [SUNDAY] trial), in the United States (the IMPRoving outcomes in vascular DisEase - aortic dissection [IMPROVE-AD] trial) and the United Kingdom (the Early aortic repair in patients needing endovascular surgery for type B aortic dissection [EARNEST] trial), which promise to provide conclusive, level 1 evidence to decipher whether early TEVAR in this cohort of patients in beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasiah et al. (2024) conducted a review in Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) vs. Optimal medical therapy was evaluated. Three major upcoming randomized trials (SUNDAY, IMPROVE-AD, and EARNEST) aim to provide conclusive evidence on whether early thoracic endovascular aortic repair benefits patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from JVS-Vascular Insights