Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A theoretical analysis and several econometric tests have been undertaken to examine whether the trickle down effect took place in rural India over a long time period. We found little evidence to suggest that the trickle down effect had occurred at all; our analysis suggests that the emergence of capital-labour substitution was primarily responsible for preventing growth from reducing poverty. The decline in poverty and a higher growth rate that took place during the late 1970s and 1980s were largely a result of government anti-poverty measures teamed with the more equitable distribution of credit and inputs to smaller and marginal farmers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basu et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: